review_analysis

Extract arguments, definitions, and narrative structures from review articles for academic writing.

Updated Feb 3, 2026

Search Tags:#literature review #academic research #citation #information extraction #thesis writing #review articles

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/aurelio-amerio/phd-thesis --skill review-analysis

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review_analysis
Source: https://github.com/aurelio-amerio/phd-thesis/tree/main/.agent/skills/review_analysis
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/aurelio-amerio/phd-thesis --skill review-analysis

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the extraction of detailed information and structured content from review articles, enabling efficient paraphrasing and citation for thesis incorporation.

Core Features & Use Cases

Information Extraction: Pulls key arguments, definitions, and narrative structures from review papers.
Citation-Ready Output: Formats extracted content for easy integration into academic writing, including bib-key lookups.
Use Case: When writing a literature review section for your thesis, use this Skill to quickly gather and structure the main points, definitions, and argument flow from relevant review articles, ensuring proper citation.

Quick Start

Use the review_analysis skill to extract the structure and key arguments about dark matter detection from review article source ID '002-review-dm-detection'.

Frequently Asked Questions about review_analysis

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I extract key arguments from review articles for thesis writing?▼

To extract key arguments from review articles for thesis writing, this Skill pulls narrative structures, definitions, and main points from specified source IDs, producing citation-ready content with bib-key lookups. It formats extracted information for direct integration into your literature review.

What is the best way to paraphrase review articles for a literature review without losing the original meaning?▼

The best way to paraphrase review articles for a literature review is to use this Skill to extract structured content and definitions, which you can then rephrase for thesis incorporation. It provides citation-ready output with bib-key lookups to maintain academic integrity.

Can I generate citation-ready content with bib-key lookups from academic review papers?▼

Yes, you can generate citation-ready content with bib-key lookups from academic review papers using this Skill. It extracts detailed information and formats it specifically for easy integration into academic writing, ensuring proper citation for your thesis.

Do I need a specific source registry or notebook to extract information from review articles?▼

Yes, you need a specific source registry to provide source IDs and a designated notebook for queries to extract information from review articles. The Skill requires these specific source IDs from the source_registry to target and pull the correct content.

How do I structure arguments and define concepts for a thesis using review articles?▼

To structure arguments and define concepts for a thesis using review articles, this Skill extracts the narrative structure and definitions from the papers. It processes the review articles to provide a structured flow of arguments for your academic writing.

What are the limitations of using automated information extraction for academic research?▼

A limitation of automated information extraction for academic research is that it requires specific source IDs from a source registry and a designated notebook for queries. It focuses on paraphrasing external content and structuring arguments, meaning it does not generate original research data.