review-and-commit

Automate pre-commit review, safe auto-fixes, and conventional commit messages.

1|Updated Dec 30, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/awegg/BackupChrono --skill review-and-commit
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-and-commit
Source: https://github.com/awegg/BackupChrono/tree/main/.github/skills/review-and-commit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/awegg/BackupChrono --skill review-and-commit

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill automates the pre-commit review and commit process, ensuring changes are analyzed, vetted, and committed only after a manual verification pass, reducing bugs and improving code quality.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automates pre-commit analysis and reporting to surface issues early.
  • Enforces a mandatory manual review step before staging and committing changes.
  • Automatically fixes safe issues (formatting, linting, small corrections) and generates conventional commit messages.
  • Scenarios: when you want to review and commit large changes, or automate safe fixes while preserving human oversight.

Quick Start

To use this skill, invoke "review and commit" after making changes. It will run the pre-commit-review process, present findings, allow auto-fixes, and guide you through staging and committing with an appropriate message.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-and-commit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate a pre-commit review and safely commit large code changes?

To automate a pre-commit review and safely commit large changes, invoke a 'review and commit' sequence to run pre-commit analysis, apply safe auto-fixes, and guide staging with a generated conventional commit message after manual verification.

What is a pre-commit review workflow and how does it enforce code quality?

A pre-commit review workflow analyzes and vets changes before they are recorded in Git, enforcing a mandatory manual review step and applying safe auto-fixes like formatting and linting to reduce bugs and improve code quality.

Can I auto-fix linting and formatting issues during the Git commit process?

Yes, you can auto-fix safe linting and formatting issues during the Git commit process by running an automated pre-commit review that applies small corrections before guiding you through the final user-confirmed staging and committing.

Does automated pre-commit review work without manual verification before staging?

No, automated pre-commit review requires a mandatory manual verification pass before staging and committing, ensuring human oversight is preserved even when safe auto-fixes and conventional commit message generation are applied.

What is the best way to generate conventional commit messages for large changes?

The best way to generate conventional commit messages for large changes is using an automated pre-commit review workflow that analyzes vetted changes and auto-generates the message while guiding you through a user-confirmed staging process.