review-animations

Reviewing UI animations in a pull request involves auditing the diff for motion quality gaps against ten non-negotiable standards. It identifies issues with easing, duration, and accessibility, returning structured findings with explicit citations for actionable remediation.

Emil Kowalski's standards for UI motion encompass ten non-negotiable rules: justified motion, frequency, easing, UI duration, origin, interruptibility, GPU-only properties, accessibility, asymmetric timing, and cohesion. These ensure motion aligns with design language and accessibility goals.

Checking CSS animation accessibility and motion design involves evaluating the diff against specific UI standards. It flags gaps in interruptibility, asymmetric timing, and GPU-only properties, providing a remediation hierarchy to guide safer and more cohesive motion fixes.

Automating animation quality code review involves applying an Editor-quality check to UI diffs. This skill audits motion changes automatically, applying escalation triggers and a remediation hierarchy to ensure new animations meet cohesive product design and accessibility standards.

The remediation hierarchy for fixing animation craft gaps provides a structured approach to guide teams toward faster and safer motion fixes. It prioritizes audit findings from the diff, offering concrete recommendations for easing, duration, and transform-origin adjustments.