review-architecture

Reviewing code architecture involves auditing module boundaries, dependency direction, and interface stability to identify cyclic dependencies and layer violations. This process produces actionable findings with specific locations and concrete refactor suggestions to ensure clear separation of concerns.

Checking for single-responsibility violations requires auditing module boundaries and coupling across API, domain, and data layers. An architecture review surfaces concrete refactor points by evaluating whether modules maintain focused responsibilities and stable interfaces without leaking implementation details.

Yes, you can perform a focused architecture review by providing a specific code scope. The audit applies to individual modules, layers, dependencies, and interfaces, evaluating boundary integrity and dependency direction to produce targeted remediation suggestions for that exact scope.

Analyzing dependency direction confirms inner module stability and proper outer abstractions by auditing how layers interact. An architecture review identifies leaking implementation details and enforces correct dependency flow, ensuring inner layers remain stable and unaffected by outer changes.

Yes, an architectural code review provides actionable findings with precise locations and practical remediation suggestions. It evaluates interface stability, coupling, and module boundaries, outputting a structured list detailing exactly where and how to refactor problematic dependencies.