review

To review a planning-phase document, apply mode-specific schemas to find missing context, contradictions, and implementation risks. The review returns structured findings with severity labels and targeted patch guidance for the relevant plan sections.

A zero-context plan review evaluates a planning artifact without prior background knowledge to identify unclear decisions and missing context. You need it to gate plan progress and ensure the document is self-contained before moving into execution.

Check execution readiness by running an implementer-readiness review against the authority contract. This validates technical deployment, auth/data contracts, and operational risk checks to ensure the plan is safe for execution.

Yes, automation-readiness mode validates the automation manifest and execution truth sources. It applies strict adherence to authority boundaries to ensure the plan contains no invented or execution-unsafe conclusions before automated deployment.

The best way to label non-blocker issues is through plan-tier calibration using Lite or Full severity schemas. This categorizes findings with stable IDs, distinguishing execution-blocking risks from minor contradictions that require targeted patch guidance.

You should not use expert-tech review when the plan artifact lacks defined authority contracts or execution truth sources. Applying it without these boundaries risks generating invented conclusions and execution-unsafe patch guidance.