review

Identify and categorize bugs, security issues, performance problems, and styling violations in codebases.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/bilgrami/corporate-agent --skill review-bilgrami
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/bilgrami/corporate-agent/tree/main/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/bilgrami/corporate-agent --skill review-bilgrami

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Perform comprehensive evaluation of codebases to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and style violations, delivering actionable feedback.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Bugs: Detect logical errors, edge cases, and exception handling gaps across languages and frameworks.
  • Security: Identify insecure patterns, credential exposure risks, and auth/authorization weaknesses.
  • Performance & Style: Highlight inefficiencies, code smells, and adherence to style guidelines with concrete improvements.
  • Use Case: Teams submitting a PR expect a prioritized review with severity levels and recommended fixes.

Quick Start

Provide the codebase or repository and ask the agent to run a comprehensive automated and manual review to surface critical issues.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform an automated code review to identify bugs and security vulnerabilities?

Automated code review identifies bugs and security vulnerabilities by analyzing your codebase to categorize issues and deliver prioritized feedback. You provide the repository, and the agent surfaces critical security risks and logical errors with concrete recommendations.

What is the best way to get actionable feedback on code styling and performance issues before a PR?

Getting actionable feedback on code styling and performance issues requires evaluating your codebase against best-practice guidelines. This process highlights inefficiencies and code smells, delivering structured, prioritized feedback with severity levels suitable for PR reviews.

Can I review a full project codebase for security and performance problems, or only single-file changes?

Reviewing a full project codebase for security and performance problems is fully supported. The evaluation applies to single-file changes, modules, or full projects, enabling thorough feedback across various languages and frameworks without scale limitations.

How does a comprehensive code review categorize and prioritize different types of code violations?

A comprehensive code review categorizes violations by identifying and grouping bugs, security issues, performance problems, and styling violations. It produces structured, prioritized feedback with concrete recommendations and severity levels to guide your fixes.

Do I need to configure specific rules to detect credential exposure risks and auth weaknesses?

Detecting credential exposure risks and auth weaknesses does not require configuring specific rules. The evaluation automatically identifies insecure patterns and authorization weaknesses across your codebase, surfacing them as prioritized security issues.

Why does my code review feedback need severity levels for edge cases and exception handling gaps?

Code review feedback needs severity levels for edge cases and exception handling gaps to help teams prioritize fixes effectively. Structured, prioritized feedback ensures critical bugs and security vulnerabilities are addressed before minor styling violations.