review

Dispatch spec-compliance and code-quality reviewers in a two-pass review workflow.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/bketelsen/ytsejam --skill review-bketelsen
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/bketelsen/ytsejam/tree/main/contrib/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/bketelsen/ytsejam --skill review-bketelsen

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automates the verification of work by performing a two-pass code review: first ensure the task aligns with the spec, then assess code quality to prevent regressions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Two-stage reviews: Dispatch a spec-compliance reviewer followed by a quality reviewer to validate tasks before merging.
  • Guardrails for workflow: Enforces order of operations and repeatable review discipline to reduce defects.
  • Manual and automated runs: Works when invoked by the develop skill or triggered manually to sanity-check changes.

Quick Start

Dispatch the spec compliance reviewer for a given task, then dispatch the quality reviewer after spec results.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate spec-compliance and code-quality checks before merging development tasks?

Automate code review with a two-pass workflow that dispatches a spec-compliance reviewer first, followed by a quality reviewer, ensuring strict spec adherence before changes are merged. This enforces review discipline and reduces defects.

How does two-pass code review automation work?

Two-pass code review works by deterministically dispatching a spec-compliance subagent first and a quality reviewer second. This orchestrated sequence verifies task alignment with the spec before formal quality checks are applied for integration.

When do I need a two-stage code review process?

You need a two-stage code review process when development tasks require strict spec adherence before changes are merged and formal quality checks before integration. It applies to workflows needing repeatable review discipline to prevent regressions.

Can I trigger code review manually to sanity-check my changes?

Yes, you can trigger code review manually to sanity-check changes. The two-pass review workflow works when invoked by the develop skill or triggered manually to validate task context, apply reviewer prompts, and verify spec compliance.

What is the best way to enforce order of operations for code review delegation?

The best way to enforce review order is using a deterministic delegation workflow that dispatches a spec-compliance reviewer first and a quality reviewer second. This automated guardrail ensures repeatable review discipline and prevents regressions.

Do I need to provide task context and reviewer prompts for automated code review?

Yes, you must provide task context and reviewer prompts for automated code review. The orchestration requirements demand deterministic delegation across subagents to properly dispatch the spec-compliance and quality reviewers in sequence.