review-board

Multi-role code review for iterative development orchestrates feedback from specialized roles like Architect, PM, Dev Engineer, QA, and UX. It analyzes the spec and existing code to identify deviations, consolidating feedback into a final implementation decision with risks and action items.

Multi-agent implementation planning analyzes the project spec, existing code, and progress to identify deviations and impacts. It consolidates specialized role feedback into a concrete implementation plan, ensuring spec alignment while evaluating feasibility, architecture fit, and testing strategy.

Identify spec deviations by analyzing existing code against the project specification to detect misalignments. Risk assessment then evaluates these deviations and proposed implementations, consolidating feedback into action items, alternatives, and potential issues before coding begins.

Iterative development review operates with no external dependencies. It functions as a standalone orchestration process that analyzes your project spec and codebase directly, requiring only your existing implementation progress and specification documents to execute multi-role feedback consolidation.

Use a structured implementation review when starting a new feature to get comprehensive feedback before coding begins. Standard code review evaluates finished code, while this approach orchestrates multi-role planning to ensure architectural fit, resource feasibility, and robust testing strategy early.

Consolidate feedback from architects, QA, and PMs by orchestrating a multi-role collaborative review focused on the next objective. This process analyzes specs and existing code, merging specialized perspectives into a unified implementation decision that includes risks, alternatives, and actionable items.