skills.rest
BoomberAsp
BoomberAspCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

review

Review research papers and reports for methodology and evidence grounding.

1|Updated May 15, 2026
Search Tags:#research analysis#paper editing#evidence-based review#research paper review#academic quality control
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/BoomberAsp/DeeperScientist --skill review-boomberasp
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/BoomberAsp/DeeperScientist/tree/main/src/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/BoomberAsp/DeeperScientist --skill review-boomberasp

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill facilitates a structured, skeptical review process for research papers and reports, ensuring technical rigor and evidence grounding in the review.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Review: Provides a comprehensive review template, guiding through key aspects such as strengths, weaknesses, and actionable suggestions.
  • Evidence-Driven Analysis: Assesses the novelty, value, rigor, clarity, and evidence sufficiency of research.
  • Revision Planning: Offers concrete revision plans and experiment TODO lists to address identified issues.
  • Use Case: Use this Skill when a research paper or report is nearing completion and requires an independent, evidence-based review before submission.

Quick Start

Run the review skill on your draft document 'final_paper.md'.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct an evidence-based review of a research paper?▼

To conduct an evidence-based review, this Skill analyzes the paper's claims, methodology, and evidence sufficiency, then generates a structured report with actionable revision suggestions and follow-up experiment TODO lists.

What is the best way to check academic quality control before submitting a paper?▼

For academic quality control, this Skill performs a structured, skeptical review assessing technical rigor, novelty, value, and clarity, providing concrete revision plans to address identified weaknesses before submission.

How do I get structured revision suggestions for my research report?▼

To get structured revision suggestions, run this Skill on your draft document; it evaluates evidence grounding and methodology, returning a comprehensive template covering strengths, weaknesses, and actionable steps.

Can I use this to review the methodology and evidence grounding of a technical report?▼

Yes, you can use this Skill to review technical reports; it specifically focuses on evaluating research quality, methodology, and evidence grounding to ensure technical rigor.

Does this review process provide a revision plan and follow-up experiments?▼

Yes, the review process provides a concrete revision plan and an experiment TODO list designed to address the methodological and evidence-based issues identified during the analysis.

When should I not use an automated research paper review?▼

You should not use an automated research paper review when your document is still in early drafting stages; this Skill is designed for papers nearing completion that require an independent, evidence-based review before submission.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
yu13130122297yu13130122297

review

Review research drafts for claim validity, methodology, and evidence support.

Community
Intermediate
Rycen7822Rycen7822
2

review

Audit draft documents and produce skeptical evaluations with revision plans.

Community
Advanced
PKU-ASALPKU-ASAL
43

markdown-review

Review markdown academic papers against CoPaper GUI structure criteria.

Official
Advanced
OwnLabAIOwnLabAI
21

scientific-critical-thinking

Assess scientific claims and evidence quality using GRADE and Cochrane ROB frameworks.

Official
Advanced