review-build

Review code builds using a tiered protocol and fix obvious errors.

Updated Dec 8, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/marcusglee11/LifeOS --skill review-build
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-build
Source: https://github.com/marcusglee11/LifeOS/tree/main/.claude/skills/review-build
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/marcusglee11/LifeOS --skill review-build

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of reviewing code builds generated by other agents, ensuring quality, consistency, and adherence to project standards before integration.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Tiered Review Protocol: Assesses code changes across correctness, completeness, consistency, safety, and test coverage.
  • Automated Fixes: Implements straightforward fixes for common issues directly.
  • Intelligent Escalation: Identifies critical issues, proposes options for judgment calls, and escalates architectural concerns.
  • Use Case: After an agent generates a new feature branch, this Skill can automatically review the code, fix minor bugs, and flag complex issues for human developer attention, significantly speeding up the development cycle.

Quick Start

Use the review-build skill to review the changes on the 'feature/new-login' branch.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-build

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for agent-generated builds?

Automated code review for agent builds uses a tiered protocol to assess correctness, completeness, consistency, safety, and test coverage. It fixes obvious errors in-place and escalates architectural concerns for human attention.

What is the best way to verify agent output before integrating new branches?

Verifying agent output before integration involves comparing changes against a base commit to identify regressions. This build verification process automatically implements straightforward fixes for common issues and flags complex judgment calls.

How does build verification handle complex architectural concerns?

Build verification handles architectural concerns by escalating them rather than auto-fixing. It identifies critical issues, proposes options for judgment calls, and flags architectural regressions for human developer review.

Can I review specific commit ranges instead of entire feature branches?

Yes, build verification operates on specified branches or commit ranges. It compares these targeted changes against a base commit to identify regressions and assess code quality across the modified scope.

Does automated code review fix errors automatically or just report them?

Automated code review implements straightforward fixes for common errors directly in-place. For complex judgment calls and architectural concerns, it proposes solutions and escalates the issues rather than applying blind fixes.

When do I need to manually intervene during agent build verification?

Manual intervention is needed when build verification escalates architectural concerns or judgment calls. The automated tiered protocol handles obvious errors, but complex regressions and design decisions require human developer attention.