review-challenge-thinking

What problem does it solve?

Critically evaluate QA proposals, RFP responses, strategies, and roadmaps to identify gaps, over-commitments, weak assumptions, missing ownership, and defensibility risks before they reach client or leadership audiences. Use as a pre-submission quality gate on any content that will face external or executive scrutiny. Trigger on final RFP review, QA strategy validation, roadmap review, or any output described as needing a 'sense check', 'challenge', or 'review'. This skill strengthens credibility without redesigning solutions.

Core Features & Use Cases

• Structured review: Applies a five-lens framework to surface gaps, ownership gaps, and defensibility risks in client-ready outputs.
• Governance & gating: Enforces a consistent quality gate before external submissions to ensure credible, defendable proposals.
• Use Case: Before submitting a client proposal, run this skill to surface gaps and assign owners for outstanding actions, enabling a clean, defendable submission.

Quick Start

Run a pre-submission review to surface gaps and assign action owners for outstanding items.