review-chapter

Audit LaTeX and Typst book chapters through a phased review pipeline with severity-ranked findings.

Updated Jan 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/yannickloth/health-me-cfs --skill review-chapter
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-chapter
Source: https://github.com/yannickloth/health-me-cfs/tree/main/.claude/skills/review-chapter
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yannickloth/health-me-cfs --skill review-chapter

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates a comprehensive, multi-phase review of a single book chapter to surface structural, factual, pedagogical, and stylistic issues so authors and editors can prioritize fixes without manually running many separate checks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Format detection and agent mapping for LaTeX and Typst chapter files to run appropriate validators.
  • Phased pipeline covering structural integrity, content correctness, pedagogical quality, redundancy checks, style and longevity, and build verification with a checkpoint after Phase 2.
  • Produces a severity-ranked consolidated report summarizing critical, warning, and informational findings for editorial decision-making.
  • Use case: Run an end-to-end audit on contents/part2-pathophysiology/ch07-immune-dysfunction.tex to verify cross-references, citations, figures, exercises, and build status before peer review.

Quick Start

Run a full chapter review on contents/part2-pathophysiology/ch07-immune-dysfunction.tex and return the consolidated report.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-chapter

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate a chapter review for LaTeX and Typst files?

Automate a chapter review by running a sequential pipeline of review agents on LaTeX and Typst files to validate cross-references, citations, figures, and pedagogical quality. The pipeline produces a severity-ranked consolidated report summarizing critical, warning, and informational findings for editorial decision-making.

Can I check pedagogical quality and citation correctness in a single run?

Check pedagogical quality and citation correctness in a single run by applying a phased pipeline that covers structural integrity, content correctness, and redundancy checks. A checkpoint after Phase 2 ensures validation before proceeding to style, longevity, and build verification.

What is a consolidated findings report for book chapter audits?

A consolidated findings report for book chapter audits is a severity-ranked output summarizing critical, warning, and informational issues. It aggregates results from multiple review agents covering structural integrity, factual correctness, pedagogical quality, and build status into a single document for editorial decision-making.

Does the chapter audit pipeline work with both LaTeX and Typst formats?

The chapter audit pipeline works with both LaTeX and Typst formats through format detection and conditional agent mapping. It automatically identifies the file format and applies the appropriate validators to run checks for cross-references, citations, figures, and build status.

What is the best way to verify cross-references and figures before peer review?

Verify cross-references and figures before peer review by running an end-to-end audit on chapter files. The pipeline validates structural integrity and content correctness, producing a consolidated report that highlights critical issues and warnings to prioritize fixes efficiently.

Why does the chapter review pipeline include a checkpoint after Phase 2?

The chapter review pipeline includes a checkpoint after Phase 2 to validate structural integrity and content correctness before advancing to style, longevity, and build verification. This phased execution ensures foundational errors are resolved before running deeper pedagogical and redundancy checks.