skills.rest
arsen-ask-lx
arsen-ask-lxCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

review-checklist

Automate code-review guidelines with severity levels and standardized verdict formats.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
Search Tags:#code-review#review-checklist#diff-comments#severity-levels#verdict-format#django-anti-patterns
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/arsen-ask-lx/.claude_file_4all --skill review-checklist-arsen-ask-lx
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-checklist
Source: https://github.com/arsen-ask-lx/.claude_file_4all/tree/main/skills/review-checklist
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/arsen-ask-lx/.claude_file_4all --skill review-checklist-arsen-ask-lx

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill consolidates code-review guidelines, severity levels, and standardized verdict formats to ensure consistent feedback and faster decision-making across teams.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Severity levels and verdict mapping: CRITICAL/MAJOR/MINOR/NIT with explicit outcomes (BLOCKED/CHANGES_REQUESTED/APPROVED) to reduce ambiguity.
  • Structured review format: Standardized verdict sections, checks, and issue formatting for reproducible reviews.
  • Django anti-patterns, N+1 checks, and dbt-like validation: Quick references to common pitfalls and verification criteria.
  • Use Case: A Reviewer agent formats review results for a Builder and logs feedback in a consistent template.

Quick Start

Follow the guide to perform a code review using the standardized checklist on the current PR.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-checklist

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I standardize code review severity levels and verdicts across my engineering team?▼

You can perform a standardized code review by applying a structured checklist to your current PR, formatting issues by severity, and logging feedback in a consistent template for the Builder.

How do I format PR diff comments to ensure consistent code review feedback?▼

PR diff comments are formatted using a standardized review structure that defines verdict sections, checks, and issue formatting, enabling reproducible reviews and faster decision-making for engineering teams.

Does this code review checklist include checks for Django anti-patterns and N+1 query issues?▼

Yes, the code review checklist includes quick references for Django anti-patterns, N+1 query checks, and dbt-like validation criteria to help reviewers spot common framework and database pitfalls.

What is the best way to automate code review guidelines for a Reviewer agent?▼

Automating code review guidelines for a Reviewer agent involves encapsulating review rules, severity levels, and verdict formats into a standardized template that formats results and logs feedback consistently for the Builder.

Can I use this review checklist to enforce consistent code reviews across multiple projects?▼

Yes, you can use this review checklist to enforce consistent code reviews across multiple projects by applying its standardized severity levels, verdict mapping, and structured issue formatting to every pull request.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
aarushlohitaarushlohit

zen-review

Review pull request changes for correctness, security, performance, and quality.

Community
Advanced
Envy-7zEnvy-7z

mobile-pr-merge-gatekeeper

Analyze Android and Flutter pull request diffs and classify findings by severity.

Community
Advanced
BagelHoleBagelHole
46

sast-scanning

Performs static security testing on source code using Semgrep, CodeQL, and SonarQube.

Community
Intermediate
igbuendigbuend
8

semgrep

Automates static code analysis with Semgrep to detect vulnerabilities and anti-patterns.

Community
Intermediate