review-checklist

Perform a standardized code review by applying severity-based checklists to your .NET pull requests to identify architecture, security, performance, testing, and style issues. The review categorizes findings into Critical, Major, Minor, and Info tiers to prioritize fixes before merging.

A severity-based code review checklist is a structured process that evaluates code changes using predefined Critical, Major, Minor, and Info tiers. It systematically identifies architecture, security, performance, testing, and style issues in .NET codebases to ensure consistent review standards.

Review event sourcing changes and domain-driven design boundaries by applying targeted checklists to surface immutability, outbox pattern, and authorization issues. This process evaluates microservice API handlers and produces categorized severity findings with actionable remediation suggestions.

Yes, you can generate ready-to-use PR comments from code review findings. The review process outputs categorized severity summaries and precise templates with actionable remediation suggestions, allowing you to directly convert the identified issues into pull request comments.

Yes, this code review checklist explicitly supports .NET microservice patterns and event sourcing. It provides prebuilt category-specific guidance tailored to .NET architectures, evaluating changes to event sourcing, API handlers, and domain-driven design boundaries.

Prioritize security and performance issues during a PR review by applying severity tiers. The checklist systematically evaluates code for security vulnerabilities and performance bottlenecks like N+1 issues, categorizing them as Critical, Major, Minor, or Info to dictate fix priority.