review-code

Pre-pull request code review automation analyzes branch diffs across security, quality, documentation, and domain perspectives. It executes SAST checks and delivers council-ready reports with formal votes to accelerate safe merges before changes are submitted.

A code review council coordinates multiple evaluation perspectives—security, quality, documentation, and domain—to assess code changes. It automates diff analysis, performs SAST checks, and delivers formal votes with structured findings for merge decisions.

SAST checks and diff analysis can be executed on feature branches during pre-PR review cycles. The skill applies to ongoing review cycles where code changes exist, running security scans and surfacing issues before pull request submission.

This code review approach applies to both pre-PR feature branch checks and ongoing review cycles where code changes exist. It activates the Review Council whenever diffs are available, making it suitable for continuous evaluation beyond new pull requests.

Structured findings and formal votes are generated by coordinating a multi-perspective council review across security, quality, documentation, and domain dimensions. The system automates diff analysis and SAST checks to deliver council-ready recommendations for merge decisions.

Automated council-style code review should not be used when no code diffs exist for analysis, since the system requires branch changes to evaluate. For trivial modifications lacking security or documentation implications, the multi-perspective assessment overhead may be unnecessary.