review-code

Review code against specs, designs, and ADR/DES guidance.

1|1|Updated Dec 9, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/asermax/claude-plugins --skill review-code-asermax
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-code
Source: https://github.com/asermax/claude-plugins/tree/main/katachi/skills/review-code
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/asermax/claude-plugins --skill review-code-asermax

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Review code against specs, designs, and decision compliance to ensure quality and traceability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured workflow that references architecture decisions and design documents.
  • Consistent evaluation of code against ADRs/DES and feature specs.
  • Clear, actionable findings with severity levels and improvement guidance.

Quick Start

Provide the target code or branch, and I will perform a standards-based review against specs, design decisions, and ADRs.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-code

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code reviews against architecture decisions and design specs?

You can automate structured code reviews by providing the target code or branch for evaluation against specs, design decisions, and ADRs. This process verifies code changes against architecture documents to ensure consistent, scalable reviews with traceable decisions.

What is standards-based code review and why is it needed?

Standards-based code review evaluates code changes against feature specs, design documents, and ADR guidance. It is needed to solve the problem of verifying code compliance with architectural decisions, ensuring consistent quality and traceable decisions across projects.

How do I perform a code review for a specific branch or file set?

To review a branch or file set, provide the target code to the automated workflow. It evaluates the code changes against architecture decisions, design documents, and feature specs, presenting clear, actionable findings with severity levels and improvement guidance.

Can I use architecture decision records to guide automated code reviews?

Yes, automated code reviews can be guided by Architecture Decision Records. The review workflow incorporates ADRs and design documentation to evaluate code changes, ensuring compliance with established architectural decisions and providing traceable, standards-based findings.

What is the best way to ensure consistent code reviews across multiple projects?

The best way to ensure consistent code reviews across multiple projects is to use an automated, standards-based workflow that evaluates code against specs, designs, and ADRs. This approach delivers consistent, scalable reviews with traceable decisions and severity-based recommendations across all file sets.