Review completed code diffs for correctness, security, performance, and architecture risks.
npx skills add https://github.com/nuttaruj/rolepod --skill review-code-nuttaruj
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: review-code Source: https://github.com/nuttaruj/rolepod/tree/main/core/skills/review-code Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nuttaruj/rolepod --skill review-code-nuttaruj
This Skill helps teams perform disciplined, risk-aware code reviews before merge or release, so bugs, security gaps, weak tests, performance regressions, and architectural mistakes are caught before they land.
Ask the AI to review your completed diff for correctness, security, performance, architecture, UI, and test quality, then return a severity-ordered review report with merge guidance.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To review a complex multi-file diff for merge readiness, route the completed code changes through a risk-based reviewer selection that identifies correctness, security, performance, UI, architecture, and testing risks. This produces severity-ordered findings with file and line references, plus clear merge approval guidance.
Adversarial code review for high-risk surfaces like auth or billing applies a stricter fresh-context review path to sensitive diffs involving secrets, crypto, tokens, or payments. This process pressure-tests the changes to catch security gaps and correctness bugs before they land in the main branch.
To audit public API or schema changes before shipping, you review the completed diff for architectural and correctness risks using a structured validation process. This generates a canonical review report containing severity-ordered findings with file and line references, along with approval or rejection guidance.
Yes, a structured code review checks for performance regressions and weak tests by evaluating the completed code changes across multiple risk dimensions. It identifies performance issues and testing gaps, then outputs a severity-ordered report with fix directions and merge readiness recommendations.
Use risk-based reviewer selection for pull requests when evaluating pre-merge validation, high-risk surfaces, public API changes, or complex multi-file diffs. It routes the review work to the appropriate specialist for security, correctness, performance, UI, or architecture concerns to ensure merge readiness.
rnbenAutomates pre-commit verification with security scans, baseline tests, and an auto-fix loop.
jpoleyValidate security patch quality and regression risk for code changes.
rudironsoniExecute predefined .NET test cases for skill validation with reporting.
OneWave-AIReview code for security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and maintainability issues.
