review-coding

Automate code review by analyzing diffs against a predefined checklist covering naming conventions, style, error handling, and type safety. This process flags deviations before human review, ensuring consistency and saving developer time.

Code review findings are categorized into MUST, SHOULD, and MAY classifications. This structured Markdown output prioritizes critical fixes, recommendations, and considerations, making feedback actionable for developers.

Automated checklist review analyzes code diffs for function design and type safety adherence. It verifies the changes against project compliance criteria, identifying potential bugs and structural deviations in the submitted code.

Yes, invoke automated code compliance checks after a developer submits changes. It identifies deviations from established guidelines and outputs structured findings, acting as a preliminary filter to save human reviewer time.

The code review checklist covers security and performance alongside naming conventions, error handling, and test quality. It analyzes diffs to ensure changes comply with project coding standards and identifies potential vulnerabilities.

No external dependencies are required to run automated code style analysis. The Skill operates independently using its internal references to evaluate diffs and output categorized findings in Markdown format.