review-commit

Automate code change review for quality, security, and best practices before pull requests.

4|Updated Jan 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/signalcompose/claude-tools --skill review-commit-signalcompose
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-commit
Source: https://github.com/signalcompose/claude-tools/tree/main/plugins/code/skills/review-commit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/signalcompose/claude-tools --skill review-commit-signalcompose

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of reviewing code changes for quality, security, and best practices before a Pull Request is created, ensuring higher code standards and reducing manual review overhead.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Code Analysis: Analyzes working directory changes for critical, important, and minor issues.
  • Iterative Fixing: Employs a dedicated 'Fixer' agent to address critical and important issues.
  • Quality Gates: Ensures code meets predefined quality standards before approval.
  • Use Case: Before submitting a feature branch for review, run this Skill to automatically catch potential security vulnerabilities and bugs, and have them fixed by an agent.

Quick Start

Run a code review on the current working directory changes to prepare for a pull request.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-commit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review and quality checks before creating a pull request?

Automate code review by running an agent that analyzes working directory changes for critical, important, and minor issues, uses a dedicated fixer agent to resolve problems, and enforces an iterative review loop before creating a pull request.

What's the best way to catch security vulnerabilities and bugs in a feature branch automatically?

The best way to catch security vulnerabilities and bugs is to run an automated code analysis on your working directory changes, which categorizes issues by severity and employs a fixer agent to resolve critical and important problems.

How does the iterative fixing process work for code quality gates?

The iterative fixing process enforces a maximum of five review loops using dedicated agents to review code changes and address critical and important issues, generating an approval flag only upon successful resolution of those issues.

Can I run an automated code review directly on my current working directory changes?

Yes, you can run an automated code review directly on your current working directory changes to analyze quality, security, and best practices, preparing your code for a pull request without requiring external dependencies.

Does automated code review categorize issues by severity?

Automated code review categorizes identified issues into critical, important, and minor severity levels, using dedicated agents to iteratively fix the critical and important problems before generating a final approval flag.

What happens if critical code quality issues are not resolved after multiple review iterations?

The iterative review loop runs a maximum of five times to fix critical and important issues using a dedicated fixer agent; if these issues remain unresolved, the automated code review will not generate the final approval flag.