review-community-standard-componentization-architecture-knowledge

Evaluate DIP boundaries and module hygiene using SOLID, Hexagonal, and Clean Architecture references.

Updated May 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/usetheodev/theo-ui --skill review-community-standard-componentization-architecture-knowledge
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-community-standard-componentization-architecture-knowledge
Source: https://github.com/usetheodev/theo-ui/tree/main/.claude/skills/review-community-standard-componentization-architecture-knowledge
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/usetheodev/theo-ui --skill review-community-standard-componentization-architecture-knowledge

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Canonical knowledge anchors architecture reviews to established references, ensuring ADRs and plan rules are applied consistently.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Canonical references: Provides verbatim definitions and sources for SOLID, Hexagonal, and Clean Architecture.
  • Plan-aware evaluation: Applies plan ADRs and architecture rules to guide reviews.
  • Decision justification: Delivers concise verdicts with citations and mapping to project constraints.

Quick Start

Trigger the knowledge layer with a request like: fetch canonical definitions for SOLID and Hexagonal Architecture and apply them to the current plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-community-standard-componentization-architecture-knowledge

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review clean architecture boundaries in my current feature branch?

Review clean architecture boundaries by fetching canonical SOLID, Hexagonal, and Clean Architecture references, then applying plan-specific ADRs and architecture rules to evaluate DIP boundaries and module hygiene within your current feature branch.

What are canonical definitions for SOLID and Hexagonal Architecture?

Canonical definitions for SOLID and Hexagonal Architecture are verbatim source references provided by the knowledge layer to anchor architecture reviews and ensure ADRs and plan rules are applied consistently.

How do I apply plan-specific ADRs to evaluate dependency inversion boundaries?

Apply plan-specific ADRs to evaluate dependency inversion boundaries by triggering the knowledge layer to fetch canonical references and map your current feature branch constraints against established architecture rules for a concise verdict.

Does this architecture review approach work with existing project architecture rules?

Yes, this architecture review approach works with existing project architecture rules by applying plan-aware ADRs alongside canonical SOLID and Hexagonal references to deliver decision justifications mapped to your specific project constraints.

How do I get a concise verdict with cited sources for an architecture review?

Get a concise verdict with cited sources for an architecture review by requesting canonical definitions and applying them to your current plan, which yields actionable insights grounded in established SOLID and Clean Architecture references.