review-contract

To standardize automated code review findings into a consistent JSON format, enforce a strict canonical schema that captures file, line, severity, and blast radius. This ensures deduplication, cross-specialist aggregation, and machine-readability across all specialist agents.

The best way to deduplicate and aggregate code review findings from multiple specialist agents is to use a verifier agent that applies a predefined rubric to adjudicate severity, consolidating cross-specialist reports into a single, consistent, machine-readable JSON output.

Structured static analysis enforces severity and blast radius in PR review workflows by applying strict schema validation to every finding. This guarantees that required fields like file citations and impact analysis are present, ensuring reports are jump-to-able and actionable.

Yes, you can scale code reviews across security and performance agents by enforcing a strict JSON contract. This approach eliminates subjective feedback, ensures machine-readability, and provides a verifier agent to adjudicate severity and deduplicate cross-specialist issues.

You need a canonical JSON contract for automated code review reports when you want to eliminate inconsistent, un-actionable feedback and ensure every issue includes jump-to-able file citations, blast radius analysis, and strict schema validation for downstream processing.