review-cycle-setup

To set up runtime access permissions for an automated review cycle, you need to resolve the strongest truthful autonomous access mode for spawned auditor, reviewer, implementor, and helper executions. This involves detecting the current runtime permission model and persisting execution-access guidance into a configuration file.

If your review-cycle setup.json is missing, incomplete, stale, unparsable, or internally inconsistent, the setup process automatically detects the current runtime environment, resolves the strongest truthful autonomous access mode without silent downgrades, and rewrites the valid configuration.

You validate governance guardrails and capabilities for spawned reviewer executions by deriving the setup configuration from the detected runtime permission model. The resulting configuration is written using a helper script and validated against the schema to ensure internal consistency.

Yes, you can prevent silent downgrades by resolving the strongest truthful autonomous access mode available for the current runtime. The setup process explicitly detects worker and control-plane runtimes to ensure spawned implementor executions do not receive reduced permissions.

No, you do not need to manually define permission control rules. The setup process automatically detects the runtime permission model, applies capability detection, and persists the derived governance guardrails directly into the project configuration.

Your review-cycle setup fails when the runtime permission model changes because the existing setup becomes stale for the current runtime. The setup process detects this inconsistency, resolves the new strongest truthful autonomous access mode, and overwrites the stale configuration.