review

Automated code review for branch deltas or full-base changes is handled by identifying code changes and assessing them through a single-reviewer or multi-agent workflow. This process generates structured findings and triage-ready reports containing per-file issues with severity, type, and concrete fixes.

Yes, a multi-agent workflow orchestrates code-reviewer, security-reviewer, and a11y-reviewer simultaneously to assess code changes. This coordinated approach replaces manual cross-domain reviews by producing a consolidated summary and structured outputs from all three review perspectives.

Generating triage-ready reports for pull requests involves running an automated multi-reviewer workflow on the changed files. The process outputs structured JSON files containing per-file issues categorized by severity and type, alongside concrete fixes to streamline the triage process.

Multi-domain code review supports both branch delta reviews for changed files and full-base reviews for the entire codebase. You can apply the single-reviewer or multi-agent workflow to either scope, producing structured findings and triage-ready reports tailored to the selected review breadth.

Automated multi-domain review solves the time-consuming and error-prone nature of coordinating manual code, security, and accessibility checks. By orchestrating a multi-reviewer workflow, it ensures comprehensive coverage and produces actionable, structured findings with concrete fixes faster than manual coordination.

Deep-team collaboration for code review is needed when complex, multi-domain changes require comprehensive assessment across code, security, and accessibility. This optional mode leverages a multi-agent workflow to thoroughly coordinate findings and generate consolidated triage-ready reports for extensive branch deltas or full-base changes.