review

Name: review
Availability: InStock
Author: damilola-elegbede-org

Orchestrate multi-reviewer code, security, and accessibility reviews with structured findings.

Updated Jul 10, 2025

Search Tags:#automation #accessibility #security #teamwork #triage #code-review

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/damilola-elegbede-org/claude-config-5ad01dbe --skill review-damilola-elegbede-org

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/damilola-elegbede-org/claude-config-5ad01dbe/tree/main/system-configs/.claude/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/damilola-elegbede-org/claude-config-5ad01dbe --skill review-damilola-elegbede-org

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Coordinating thorough, multi-domain reviews for code changes is time-consuming and error-prone; this Skill orchestrates code, security, and accessibility reviews to produce actionable findings.

Core Features & Use Cases

Orchestrates a multi-reviewer workflow (code-reviewer, security-reviewer, a11y-reviewer) or a single reviewer depending on mode.
Generates structured, triage-ready outputs (.tmp/review-local.json or per-reviewer results) and provides a consolidated summary.
Supports branch delta reviews and full-base reviews, with optional deep-team collaboration.

Quick Start

Run /review on the current branch to start a delta review of changed files.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate code review for branch deltas and full-base changes?▼

Automated code review for branch deltas or full-base changes is handled by identifying code changes and assessing them through a single-reviewer or multi-agent workflow. This process generates structured findings and triage-ready reports containing per-file issues with severity, type, and concrete fixes.

Can I run a multi-agent code, security, and accessibility review simultaneously?▼

Yes, a multi-agent workflow orchestrates code-reviewer, security-reviewer, and a11y-reviewer simultaneously to assess code changes. This coordinated approach replaces manual cross-domain reviews by producing a consolidated summary and structured outputs from all three review perspectives.

What is the best way to generate triage-ready reports for pull requests?▼

Generating triage-ready reports for pull requests involves running an automated multi-reviewer workflow on the changed files. The process outputs structured JSON files containing per-file issues categorized by severity and type, alongside concrete fixes to streamline the triage process.

Does multi-domain code review work on an entire codebase or just changed files?▼

Multi-domain code review supports both branch delta reviews for changed files and full-base reviews for the entire codebase. You can apply the single-reviewer or multi-agent workflow to either scope, producing structured findings and triage-ready reports tailored to the selected review breadth.

Why should I use an automated multi-domain review instead of manual code checks?▼

Automated multi-domain review solves the time-consuming and error-prone nature of coordinating manual code, security, and accessibility checks. By orchestrating a multi-reviewer workflow, it ensures comprehensive coverage and produces actionable, structured findings with concrete fixes faster than manual coordination.

When do I need deep-team collaboration for code review?▼

Deep-team collaboration for code review is needed when complex, multi-domain changes require comprehensive assessment across code, security, and accessibility. This optional mode leverages a multi-agent workflow to thoroughly coordinate findings and generate consolidated triage-ready reports for extensive branch deltas or full-base changes.