What problem does it solve? Documentation that looks fine in Markdown source often renders badly, contains broken links, stale code references, or assumes knowledge the reader does not have. This Skill automates a multi-pass review of a live documentation site so these issues are caught before readers hit them. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Structural review: Passes the full docs tree to Gemini with a junior-researcher persona to flag unclear navigation, orphan pages, missing sections, unexplained acronyms, and assumed knowledge. - Visual review: Screenshots each rendered page via a Chrome DevTools Protocol helper (avoiding headless-browser hangs on mkdocs-material) and analyzes it with Gemini vision for broken diagrams, illegible text, poor hierarchy, and truncation. - Factual verification: Checks external links for non-200 responses, verifies referenced file paths exist in the repo, and compares documented claims against current source code and screenshots. - Use Case: Run /review-docs before publishing a docs update to receive a dated report in docs/appendix/reviews/ listing every flagged issue across structure, visuals, and accuracy. ## Quick Start Run /review-docs to audit the entire documentation site, or pass a specific page path to review just that page.