review-docs

Extract implementation requirements from design documents to generate MVP specifications and phased guidance.

Updated Jan 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/toshi-hm/dialy --skill review-docs-toshi-hm
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-docs
Source: https://github.com/toshi-hm/dialy/tree/main/.codex/skills/review-docs
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/toshi-hm/dialy --skill review-docs-toshi-hm

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps engineering teams quickly understand and extract the requirements and specifications described in design documents, reducing interpretation gaps and rework.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Identify and map relevant design documents (docs/00_INDEX.md, docs/01_REQUIREMENTS.md, docs/02_ARCHITECTURE.md, docs/03_DATA_MODEL.md, docs/04_UI_UX_DESIGN.md, docs/05_FEATURES.md, docs/06_SECURITY.md, docs/07_PERFORMANCE.md) to the requested feature or component.
  • Extract concrete requirements, constraints, and success criteria to produce MVP scope and Phase 2 considerations.
  • Provide a structured implementation guide including MVP-focused checklist, data models, and UI/UX references with direct references to the design docs.

Quick Start

Run /review-docs <feature or component name> to generate implementation briefs from the project docs.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-docs

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I extract implementation requirements from design documents?

Extract implementation requirements from design documents by mapping features to project docs like requirements, architecture, and data model files to generate MVP specifications and phased guidance. This reduces interpretation gaps and rework for engineering teams.

What design doc structure is needed to generate MVP specifications?

MVP specifications require a structured doc set including index, requirements, architecture, data model, UI UX design, features, security, and performance files. These docs provide the constraints and success criteria needed to produce actionable implementation briefs.

How do I create an MVP-focused implementation checklist from architecture docs?

Create an MVP-focused implementation checklist by applying requirement extraction to architecture and data model docs to produce validation criteria, UI UX references, and phased guidance. This translates design specifications into concrete development tasks.

Can I use this to map UI UX design requirements to feature specifications?

Yes, you can map UI UX design requirements to feature specifications by identifying relevant design doc sections and extracting concrete constraints. This produces structured UI design references with direct links to the project documentation.

What is the best way to transition from design docs to Phase 2 development guidance?

Transition to Phase 2 development guidance by extracting requirements beyond MVP scope from architecture and feature docs. This produces phased considerations that separate core implementation from future iterations based on the project documentation.

When should I not use automated design doc extraction for requirement gathering?

Automated design doc extraction is not suitable when your project lacks structured specification files like requirements, architecture, or data model docs. The extraction process depends on existing design documents to map features and generate valid MVP guidance.