review_domain

Identify architectural gaps in domain models against technical constitution requirements.

15|6|Updated Jan 5, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lionbenjamin/agent-templates --skill review-domain-lionbenjamin
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review_domain
Source: https://github.com/lionbenjamin/agent-templates/tree/main/skills/review_domain
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lionbenjamin/agent-templates --skill review-domain-lionbenjamin

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams perform rigorous architectural reviews of domain models to ensure alignment with the technical constitution, detect gaps, and enforce design discipline.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Skeptical analysis of domain structures to uncover hidden gaps and edge cases.
  • Consistency checks across terminology, types, and identifiers.
  • Constitution compliance verification, including isolation, security, and audit requirements.
  • Guidance for improvement and actionable recommendations.

Quick Start

Provide a domain model and constitution to initiate a structured review and produce a gaps report.

Frequently Asked Questions about review_domain

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform an architecture review on a domain model?

Domain model architecture reviews identify structural gaps to ensure alignment with a technical constitution. They enforce skeptical analysis, consistency, and compliance checks covering tenant isolation, security constraints, and audit trails across software systems.

Why does my domain model fail technical constitution compliance checks?

Domain models fail compliance checks due to hidden gaps in tenant isolation, security constraints, and audit trails. A skeptical architecture review identifies these inconsistencies and provides actionable recommendations to align the design with the technical constitution.

What is the best way to check domain model consistency and completeness?

The best way to check domain model consistency is by running a structured architecture validation that applies skeptical analysis to terminology, types, and identifiers. This verifies completeness and ensures conformance with governance constraints.

Can I use architecture validation for tenant isolation and security constraints?

Yes, architecture validation specifically verifies tenant isolation, security constraints, and audit trails. The review checks the domain model against the technical constitution to ensure all required governance and compliance boundaries are correctly enforced.

When do I need a domain model conformance review?

You need a conformance review during domain model drafting, design reviews, and architecture validation. It is required when you must enforce design discipline, detect structural gaps, and ensure alignment with your technical constitution across software systems.