Identify language and runtime conformance issues in C# and F# code.
npx skills add https://github.com/nesnilnehc/ai-cortex --skill review-dotnet
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: review-dotnet Source: https://github.com/nesnilnehc/ai-cortex/tree/main/skills/review-dotnet Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nesnilnehc/ai-cortex --skill review-dotnet
Analyzing .NET source code to enforce consistent language and runtime conventions (async/await, nullable references, IDisposable patterns, LINQ usage, API stability, and testability) helps teams catch quality issues early and improve maintainability without performing security or architectural reviews.
Provide a code scope (files or diffs) containing .NET code, and I will return a findings list of language-dotnet results.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To review C# code for async/await and nullable reference issues, provide your source files or diffs for analysis. The tool identifies language-runtime findings, focusing on ConfigureAwait usage, NRE avoidance patterns, and returning categorized results with file locations and suggestions.
Checking IDisposable usage and LINQ patterns in .NET involves analyzing your code scope for multiple enumeration risks and proper using statements. The review process validates resource management with IAsyncDisposable and inspects collection efficiency, outputting severity-tagged findings.
Yes, you can analyze F# source code for runtime conformance and testability. The review evaluates F# sources within a project or diff, assessing dependency injection, static usage, and overridable structures, then reports findings categorized under language-dotnet.
Validating public API surface stability in a .NET library requires providing the library's code scope for review. The analysis detects versioning signals and API stability issues across your public surface, generating a detailed findings list with locations, titles, and optional suggestions.
No, this .NET code review does not cover security vulnerabilities or architectural design. It strictly focuses on language and runtime conformance, including async/await, nullable references, IDisposable patterns, LINQ efficiency, and testability to improve maintainability.
The code review findings for .NET projects follow a structured format including file and line location, category language-dotnet, severity, title, and description. Findings also include an optional suggestion to guide fixes for identified runtime convention issues.
ClearMeasureLabsAnalyze C# source code for style violations using a clean-architecture rule profile.
simplefarmer69Integrate GitHub, CI/CD, messaging platforms, and issue trackers to automate developer operations.
albertoiruruetaRun Roslyn analyzers on .NET/C# projects and generate SARIF logs.
managedcodeConfigure .NET projects with Roslyn analyzers and .editorconfig rules.
