review-dr

To review a Decision Record, evaluate its context, alternatives, constraints, consequences, and decision criteria, then apply structured scoring to identify rationale gaps and generate actionable improvement recommendations for documentation quality.

Structured scoring for decision records is a quality assessment method that evaluates six dimensions including context, alternatives, constraints, consequences, and decision criteria to measure documentation completeness and decision justification.

Batch-reviewing proposed decision records involves inspecting all records, detecting and excluding out-of-scope design documents, then returning scored assessments with concrete improvement suggestions for each valid decision record.

Yes, you can inspect recent decision records to evaluate their quality by applying structured scoring across six dimensions to identify gaps in rationale, alternatives, and constraints without reviewing the entire repository.

A decision record should include clear context, evaluated alternatives, documented constraints, identified consequences, and explicit decision criteria to pass a quality assessment and receive high scores across all six dimensions.

Automated decision record review should not be applied to design documents that belong outside decision workflows, as the process specifically detects and excludes out-of-scope design documentation to maintain focus on architecture and process decisions.