review-draft

To get structured feedback on a draft, provide the file path to a multi-critic processor that evaluates clarity, narrative, factual accuracy, and red-team objections, generating actionable recommendations and a consolidated summary.

Multi-critic draft review is an automated process that runs four parallel evaluations on your text—clarity, narrative, facts, and red-team objections—to generate targeted, structured feedback notes for improving readability and persuasiveness.

Yes, you can use automated draft review for academic papers, policy briefs, blog posts, and product documents, applying multi-critic feedback to improve readability and persuasiveness across these various applicable contexts.

To generate red-team objections for a draft, run the red-team critic component on your provided file path, which will output targeted feedback notes under a dedicated feedback directory alongside other critic evaluations.

No specific dependencies are required to run the draft feedback process, but you must provide a valid draft file path so the system can parse the text and output the per-critic notes and summary in a feedback directory.

The best way to consolidate multiple critic reviews is to run four parallel critics on a draft, which automatically outputs a consolidated summary alongside per-critic notes in a feedback directory for quick iteration.