review

Review trading-bot code changes for risks and 10-layer architecture compliance.

Updated Apr 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/EnesMeyzin98/Meridian --skill review-enesmeyzin98
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/EnesMeyzin98/Meridian/tree/main/agents/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/EnesMeyzin98/Meridian --skill review-enesmeyzin98

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Review and document risks, architecture alignment, and quality issues introduced by code changes across the trading-bot workspace.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Disciplined review of changes spanning execution, risk, storage, analytics, and reporting to ensure safety, governance, and maintainability.
  • Verification against the 10-layer architecture and enforceable boundaries (L5-L7), with findings-first reporting to guide handoffs.

Quick Start

Inspect the repository and generate a structured findings-first review outlining risks, architecture gaps, and safety concerns.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review code changes for architecture alignment and risk management in a trading bot?

To review code changes for architecture alignment, generate a structured findings-first report identifying risks, quality issues, and governance gaps across execution, risk, storage, and analytics workflows. This enforces compliance with the 10-layer architecture and safety boundaries defined in system documentation.

What is a structured code review for autonomous trading system governance?

A structured code review for autonomous trading governance is a disciplined inspection process that verifies AI advisory boundaries, paper-only execution, and enforceable risk gates. It documents architecture alignment gaps and safety concerns introduced by changes spanning operator panels and experimental workflows.

How do I verify enforceable risk gates and paper-only execution in my trading bot workspace?

Verify enforceable risk gates and paper-only execution by inspecting code changes against the 10-layer architecture and project vision documents. The review identifies compliance violations in execution and risk management layers, ensuring autonomous operations remain safely governed.

Can I use automated code review to check compliance with a multi-layer architecture?

Yes, you can use automated code review to check multi-layer architecture compliance by analyzing changes across execution, storage, analytics, and reporting layers. It outputs a findings-first review outlining specific alignment gaps and quality issues to guide safe handoffs.

What are the limitations of applying standard code review to autonomous trading systems?

Standard code review often lacks the domain-specific constraints needed for autonomous trading systems, such as verifying AI advisory boundaries, paper-only execution modes, and specific 10-layer architecture boundaries. A specialized review is required to enforce these governance and risk-management protocols.