review-feedback

You can collect decisions on code review findings and generate an action plan through an automated interactive interview workflow that prompts you to resolve each item. This process systematically consolidates your judgments into a finalized action plan appended to the review report.

The best way to handle unresolved code review reports is to run them through a structured interview workflow. This method applies autonomous judgment criteria to each finding, ensuring no critical, major, minor, or suggestion item is skipped without an explicit decision.

The interview workflow handles ambiguous code review findings by using interactive AskUserQuestion prompts to ask you for clarification. It applies autonomous judgment criteria where possible and defers cross-component or system-design decisions to a higher-level reviewer when needed.

Yes, you can defer cross-component decisions during action plan generation. When system-design or cross-component issues arise, the workflow allows you to escalate and defer these specific decisions to a higher-level reviewer instead of forcing an immediate resolution.

No specific CI platform is required to automate code review feedback consolidation. The process operates as an interactive interview workflow driven by autonomous criteria, requiring only the review report itself to initiate finding resolution and action plan generation.

You can process Critical, Major, Minor, and Suggestion categories of code review findings using this interview workflow. The system interactively collects your decisions for each category and appends the finalized results to your review report.