review-findings-contract

To standardize code review findings into a machine-readable format, you normalize outputs into a fixed REVIEW SUMMARY block containing fields like REVIEW_VERDICT and severity counts. This enables consistent integration with CI pipelines and governance controls.

A review findings contract is a standardized format that normalizes review verdicts and severity counts into a ledger-ready output. You need it for governance workflows to ensure consistent interpretation and traceability across code, security, and accessibility audits.

Yes, you can use a single review contract format for security audits, accessibility audits, and API contract reviews. It standardizes verdicts and counts across various review scopes to ensure consistent integration within your CI governance gates.

You normalize reviewer agent outputs into a ledger-ready format by preloading the review findings contract into the workflow. This defines a fixed REVIEW SUMMARY block with verdicts and issue counts to ensure traceable, machine-readable results.

The best way to integrate review verdicts and severity counts into automated dashboards is to normalize findings into a fixed machine-readable REVIEW SUMMARY block. This standardizes pass, fail, and needs_followup verdicts for consistent dashboard consumption.

Yes, the review findings contract supports needs_followup verdicts alongside pass and fail statuses. It standardizes these verdicts and top issue counts to enable consistent integration with CI pipelines and governance controls.