review

Review documents, code, and design artifacts and generate a formal decision log.

Updated Apr 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Gami19/rd-strands-agents --skill review-gami19
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/Gami19/rd-strands-agents/tree/main/strands-py/backend/agent/skills/pr/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Gami19/rd-strands-agents --skill review-gami19

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

このスキルは、成果物(ドキュメント・コード・設計書)をクリティカルレビューで検証し、品質を保証します。

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 要件カバレッジの検証: 要件が文書内で網羅されているかを検証し、不足を指摘します。
  • 章間整合性と品質保証: 章間の矛盾や非一貫性を検出し、整合性を高めます。
  • 技術仕様とセキュリティの検証: 仕様乖離、セキュリティ、パフォーマンス、テストカバレッジを総合的に評価します。
  • ステークホルダーレポート生成: 40_decision_log へ整合した指摘と修正案を記録します。

Quick Start

Provide a structured review of the given artifacts and generate a formal decision log.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a critical code review to check requirements coverage and security?

A critical code review assesses artifacts against requirements coverage, security, and performance checks. You evaluate source code to identify specification deviations and generate remediation guidance for formal decision logging.

What is the best way to verify requirements coverage in technical specifications?

Verifying requirements coverage involves checking if all specifications are documented within the artifact. A critical review identifies missing elements, highlights chapter inconsistencies, and ensures the document maintains comprehensive technical alignment.

How do I detect specification deviations and data validation issues in architectural designs?

Detecting specification deviations requires evaluating architectural designs against defined technical specifications. You perform data validation checks to find non-compliant elements, ensuring the design meets structural and performance requirements.

Can I evaluate test coverage and performance assessments for source code without external dependencies?

Yes, evaluating test coverage and performance assessments for source code requires no external dependencies. The review process applies internal checks to identify gaps and generate formal remediation guidance directly.

How do I generate a decision log for document and design artifact reviews?

Generating a decision log involves compiling findings from chapter consistency, security, and test coverage checks. You record identified deviations and formal remediation guidance to ensure structured quality assurance.

When should I use a structured critical review for software engineering artifacts?

Use a structured critical review when you need to validate documents, source code, or architectural designs. It enforces comprehensive checks for requirements coverage and security, ensuring formal quality assurance before deployment.