Review story artefacts and emit severity-tagged findings with diffs.
npx skills add https://github.com/heymishy/2x2-v3-28-03-20216 --skill review-heymishy
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: review Source: https://github.com/heymishy/2x2-v3-28-03-20216/tree/main/.github/skills/review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/heymishy/2x2-v3-28-03-20216 --skill review-heymishy
Reviews story artefacts for quality, completeness, traceability, and scope discipline. Produces structured findings with HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW severity. On re-runs, produces a diff showing exactly what changed. HIGH findings block progression to /test-plan. Use when stories exist and someone says "review the stories", "check the definition", "quality check", "re-review", or moves past definition. Run per story or per epic batch.
Run a review pass on a single story or an epic batch to generate findings and a diff for changes.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To run a quality review on story artefacts, execute a per-story or epic-batch review pass. It validates entry conditions like parent epic and discovery artefacts, then emits deterministic findings with HIGH, MEDIUM, or LOW severities to guide test planning.
A deterministic story quality review applies structured rules loaded from artefact frontmatter to validate scope, completeness, and traceability. It produces consistent findings with severity tags and re-run diffs showing exactly what changed between passes.
Running a story quality check requires stories, a parent epic, a discovery artefact, and a benefit-metric artefact. The review enforces these entry conditions before validating scope discipline and generating a structured report.
Yes, you can re-review stories to see exactly what changed. Re-running the review produces a diff against previous findings, allowing you to track changes over time and verify if HIGH severity issues blocking progression were resolved.
When a story quality review finds HIGH severity issues, it blocks progression to the test-plan phase. The structured report surfaces these scope, completeness, or traceability issues to guide necessary fixes before moving forward.
heymishyDecompose approved discovery artefacts into MVP-aligned epics and stories.
Owl-ListenerSimulate persona interactions to validate design and output a structured synthetic-test report.
jakekauslerCoordinate testing and feedback incorporation during the Refinement phase of the epic-stage-workflow.
rjroyRetrieve GitHub backlog items filtered by Ready status and sorted by Priority P0-P3.
