review

Review code and documentation changes for quality, consistency, and security.

7|Updated Feb 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hhellbusch/my-ai-workspace --skill review-hhellbusch
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/hhellbusch/my-ai-workspace/tree/main/.agents/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hhellbusch/my-ai-workspace --skill review-hhellbusch

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines the process of reviewing changes, helping teams catch errors, inconsistencies, and issues early in the development cycle.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Pre-commit validation: Automatically checks staged and unstaged changes against repository conventions and quality standards.
  • Link verification: Validates internal links and external URLs to ensure they resolve correctly.
  • Content analysis: Flags biographical content, missing disclosures, and stale reviews in documentation files.
  • Compliance enforcement: Checks for proper directory placement, README coverage, and AI disclosure footers.

Quick Start

Run the review skill on your current git changes to analyze and flag issues before committing new code or documentation.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review and link validation before committing changes?

Automated pre-commit code review and link validation is performed by analyzing staged and unstaged changes against repository conventions. This process checks internal links, external URLs, directory placement, and README coverage to ensure quality and consistency before commit.

What's the best way to check documentation for missing AI disclosure footers and stale reviews?

Checking documentation for missing AI disclosure footers and stale reviews requires content analysis of markdown files. The review process flags biographical content, missing disclosures, and outdated review sections to enforce compliance standards across structured documentation.

Does this automated review tool work with existing git workflows and structured docs?

Automated review works directly with existing git workflows and structured docs, requiring minimal setup. It applies to code repositories containing markdown, scripts, and structured documentation, integrating seamlessly with current version control practices without disrupting development cycles.

Can I scan staged files to prevent sensitive data from being committed to git?

Scanning staged files prevents sensitive data from being committed to git by checking changes against repository conventions. The review skill analyzes staged and unstaged content to ensure the absence of sensitive information before finalizing the commit.

How do I enforce style compliance and directory placement for markdown files?

Enforcing style compliance and proper directory placement for markdown files is handled through compliance checks during pre-commit validation. The review process automatically flags files that violate repository conventions, ensuring proper structure and style coverage.