review

Analyze git diffs with multi-agent code reviews for correctness, architecture, and security.

4|Updated Jul 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/highflame-ai/ai-factory --skill review-highflame-ai
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/highflame-ai/ai-factory/tree/main/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/highflame-ai/ai-factory --skill review-highflame-ai

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses the risk of unreviewed or poorly reviewed code reaching production by automating a rigorous, multi-dimensional inspection process that catches logic, architectural, and security flaws before they are merged.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Agent Bench: Orchestrates five specialized agents (correctness, quality, architecture, test coverage, and security) to provide comprehensive feedback.
  • Context-Aware Analysis: Dynamically loads conventions, domain-specific expert knowledge, and relevant historical lessons based on the files touched in the diff.
  • Gate Enforcement: Automatically determines the review tier based on risk and enforces a strict pass/fail gate for critical findings.

Quick Start

Run the review skill to perform a full multi-agent analysis on the changes in your current branch.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate multi-agent code reviews for git diffs?

Automated multi-agent code reviews orchestrate specialized agents to analyze git diffs against project conventions, domain knowledge, and historical lessons to identify critical defects before merging. The process enforces a strict quality gate based on the risk profile of modified files.

What is multi-agent code review and how does it enforce security compliance?

Multi-agent code review is an automated inspection process that orchestrates five specialized agents for correctness, quality, architecture, test coverage, and security. It enforces security compliance by analyzing git diffs against historical incident lessons and applying a mandatory pass/fail gate for critical findings.

Can I use automated code review to analyze static analysis and test coverage together?

Yes, automated code review can analyze static analysis and test coverage together by orchestrating a bench of five specialized agents. These agents simultaneously inspect code correctness, quality, architecture, test coverage, and security to provide comprehensive feedback on your current branch.

What's the best way to enforce a quality gate for critical defects before merging?

The best way to enforce a quality gate for critical defects is through automated multi-agent analysis that determines the review tier based on the risk profile of modified files. This process applies a strict pass/fail gate by cross-referencing git diffs with project conventions and historical incident lessons.

Does automated code review work with existing project conventions and domain-specific knowledge?

Yes, automated code review works with existing project conventions and domain-specific knowledge by dynamically loading them based on the files touched in the diff. This context-aware analysis ensures the review agents evaluate changes against your specific architectural and security requirements.

When do I need automated static analysis and security checks for my current branch?

You need automated static analysis and security checks for your current branch when unreviewed code risks reaching production. Automated multi-agent reviews prevent this by catching logic, architectural, and security flaws through a rigorous, multi-dimensional inspection process before merging.