skills.rest
0xdeafcafe
0xdeafcafeCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

review-hygiene

Audit changed code with check-only linting and formatting tools.

Updated Jun 3, 2026
Search Tags:#automation#code review#linting#formatting#eslint#diagnostics#prettier
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/0xdeafcafe/skills --skill review-hygiene
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-hygiene
Source: https://github.com/0xdeafcafe/skills/tree/main/skills/review-hygiene
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/0xdeafcafe/skills --skill review-hygiene

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you audit code hygiene without flooding the AI with hundreds of low-value lint and formatting details. It runs the project's deterministic quality tools in check-only mode, then condenses the results into actionable findings that can be fixed automatically or routed for targeted follow-up.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Check-only hygiene review: Runs linters, formatters, and diagnostics without modifying files.
  • Aggregate auto-fix findings: Collapses many fixable issues from tools like Prettier, ESLint, Ruff, gofmt, rustfmt, and similar tools into one finding per tool.
  • Targeted manual findings: Separates non-auto-fixable violations, type errors, and diagnostic warnings into individual findings with suggested next actions.
  • Use case: After a large code change or pull request, use this Skill to see whether formatting drift, lint errors, or language-server diagnostics need cleanup before deeper human review.

Quick Start

Ask the agent to run review-hygiene on the files changed in your branch and summarize any auto-fixable and manual hygiene findings.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-hygiene

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run automated code review checks for linting and formatting errors?▼

Automated code review checks run deterministic linters and formatters like ESLint and Prettier in check-only mode to audit changed code. They condense results into compact, actionable findings without modifying your files.

Can I aggregate auto-fixable ESLint and Prettier violations instead of reviewing them individually?▼

Yes, auto-fixable violations from tools like ESLint, Prettier, Ruff, and gofmt are collapsed into one aggregated finding per tool. Non-fixable issues are reported as separate, targeted manual findings.

Does this code hygiene review work with Python, Go, and Rust toolchains?▼

Yes, the code hygiene review supports JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, and Rust project toolchains. It detects missing configured tools and audits pull requests or explicit file scopes.

What is the best way to check formatting drift before a pull request review?▼

The best way to check formatting drift is running a check-only hygiene audit on changed branch files. This identifies formatting drift and lint errors needing cleanup before deeper human review.

Why does the code review report missing configured diagnostic tools?▼

The code review detects missing configured tools to ensure deterministic quality checks execute completely. This safe read-only behavior prevents silent failures when expected linters are absent from the environment.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
kirvinkirvin

preflight-checks

Run project-specific linters, formatters, and type checkers on staged files.

Community
Intermediate
Gzmomo001Gzmomo001
3

ruff-lint-fixer

Run Ruff lint checks, apply auto-fixes, and report remaining violations.

Community
Intermediate
ProfessioneITProfessioneIT
20

lsp-mcp-server

Bridge Claude Code to Language Server Protocol servers for semantic code intelligence.

Official
Advanced
billwanggithubbillwanggithub

rust-analyzer-lsp

Analyzes Rust codebases providing diagnostics, refactoring tools, and inline documentation via rust-analyzer LSP.

Community
Intermediate