review-illustrations

To audit scientific diagrams for layout and visual bias, you can run a multi-phase review pipeline that checks figures for layout problems, caption quality, scientific accuracy, visual rhetoric, and cross-figure inconsistencies, producing a prioritized markdown report.

Yes, you can check multiple illustration files for cross-figure consistency by passing a glob pattern or file paths. The review resolves globs, reports the scope, and runs a consistency audit across the matched figures to aggregate findings.

A figure audit report for research workflows includes findings categorized by layout, caption quality, scientific accuracy, visual rhetoric, and cross-figure consistency, with critical items highlighted to help prioritize necessary fixes before submission.

Yes, the diagram review process skips scientific accuracy and cross-figure consistency phases for placeholder images or single-figure scopes, applying guards to ensure the audit only runs relevant checks for the resolved scope.

The best way to review typst figures for caption quality and scientific accuracy is to run a sequential five-agent audit that evaluates each dimension read-only and writes an aggregated, timestamped markdown report to a runtime directory.