review

Validate repository architecture, quality standards, and testing conventions.

Updated Mar 27, 2026

Search Tags:#testing #architecture #documentation #quality #review #code-review #repo-guidelines

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/ironloon/peninsular-reveries --skill review-ironloon

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/ironloon/peninsular-reveries/tree/main/.pi/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ironloon/peninsular-reveries --skill review-ironloon

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill provides a structured framework to review and audit the repository's architecture, game quality standards, and testing conventions, helping teams maintain consistency as Peninsular Reveries evolves.

Core Features & Use Cases

Guided architecture review: verify project structure, module contracts, and deployment flow.
Quality and testing audits: verify layout, accessibility, and CI/test gating against documented references.
On-demand reference loading: quick lookup of architecture, game quality, testing, security, and educational research guidelines to inform changes.

Quick Start

Load the architecture, game-quality, and testing references to align work with repo standards and run the local validation gates.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I audit repository architecture and quality standards during a code review?▼

To audit repository architecture and quality standards during a code review, apply this skill to validate project structure, module contracts, and quality conventions against documented references.

What is the best way to verify testing conventions and CI gating before merging feature work?▼

The best way to verify testing conventions and CI gating is to load the testing references and run local validation gates to ensure changes align with documented guidelines.

Can I use this framework to review UX polishing and bug fixes across a large codebase?▼

Yes, you can use this review framework for UX polishing and bug fixes across large codebases by mapping tasks to documented architecture, game-quality, and security guidelines.

Does this code review process require loading security and educational research guidelines?▼

Yes, the code review process requires loading security and educational research references during planning and validation to ensure comprehensive architecture and quality audits.

What are the limitations of applying automated quality audits to deployment flow verification?▼

The quality audits map tasks to documented guidelines but rely on loading predefined references, meaning deployment flow verification is constrained to the repository's existing architecture standards.