review

Generate literature reviews with citations verified against PubMed and CrossRef.

1|1|Updated Feb 10, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jason-jj-li/skills --skill review-jason-jj-li
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/jason-jj-li/skills/tree/main/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jason-jj-li/skills --skill review-jason-jj-li

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Verification-first literature reviews prevent citation hallucination by restricting references to verified PubMed/CrossRef sources, ensuring complete traceability to source data.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Retrieval-first workflow: lock down citations to verified sources before synthesis.
  • End-to-end automation: Phase0-Phase5 scripts coordinate search, retrieval, screening, writing, and verification.
  • Use Case: ideal for systematic reviews, scoping studies, and any academic writing where citation integrity is critical.

Quick Start

Run the end-to-end workflow to generate a fully cited literature review with verified citations.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I prevent citation hallucination in automated literature reviews?

To prevent citation hallucination in literature reviews, you can constrain references to verified PubMed and CrossRef sources. This approach locks down citations to real data before synthesis, ensuring complete traceability to source data.

What is the best way to automate a systematic literature review with traceable references?

The best way to automate a systematic literature review is using an end-to-end workflow that coordinates search strategy, retrieval, screening, writing, and verification. This deterministic process enforces a retrieval-first workflow to maintain citation integrity.

Can I use PubMed and CrossRef sources for academic writing verification?

Yes, you can use PubMed and CrossRef sources for academic writing verification. Restricting citations to these verified databases ensures that every reference in your literature review is completely traceable to source data.

How do I run an end-to-end workflow for scoping studies and systematic reviews?

You run an end-to-end workflow for scoping studies by executing coordinated scripts across five phases. These scripts manage the entire process from generating a search strategy and batch retrieval to screening, writing with citations, and final verification.

Does this literature review approach work for scoping studies and academic writing?

Yes, this literature review approach works for scoping studies and academic writing. It is specifically designed for any academic writing where citation integrity is critical, including systematic reviews that require verified, traceable references.

Why does my automated literature review include untraceable citations?

Automated literature reviews include untraceable citations when they lack a retrieval-first constraint to verified sources. Enforcing a deterministic workflow that restricts references to PubMed and CrossRef prevents citation hallucination and ensures traceability.