Analyze code changes using Claude and Cursor models with multi-provider review.
npx skills add https://github.com/jdidion/claude-plugins --skill review-jdidion
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: review Source: https://github.com/jdidion/claude-plugins/tree/main/plugins/crew/skills/review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jdidion/claude-plugins --skill review-jdidion
## What problem does it solve? Multi-provider code review by running parallel analyses across Claude and Cursor models, then merging findings into a single, coherent report.
## Core Features & Use Cases
### Quick Start Run a multi-provider code review on this branch.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Run a multi-model code review by executing a single command that analyzes branch changes since the last run, combining Claude and Cursor models to merge findings into one report.
Multi-provider code review runs parallel analyses across Claude and Cursor models, then merges results into a centralized report with attribution and merge logic for comprehensive findings.
Multi-model code review supports incremental, local, and MR/PR scopes, allowing you to analyze changes within merge requests or pull requests using model routing.
Yes, you can use Cursor and Claude models together for diff analysis via cross-backend orchestration, which routes prompts to both providers and merges their code review findings.
Multi-provider code review requires configured backends for Claude and Cursor, with optional additional providers, to enable standardized prompt assembly, diff capture, and result merging.
mprycyesd4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4d4 { }
assertchrisResolve Git merge conflicts file by file using a rebase strategy.
danieldev24Automates CI/CD pipeline setup and quality gates for code verification.
LuisSambranoPerform systematic code review and static analysis across multiple programming languages.
