skills.rest
jmylchreest
jmylchreestCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

review

Automate code reviews and security audits on pull requests and diffs.

15|4|Updated Feb 3, 2026
Search Tags:#maintainability#best-practices#static-analysis#code-review#security-audit#mcp-tools
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jmylchreest/aide --skill review-jmylchreest
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/jmylchreest/aide/tree/main/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jmylchreest/aide --skill review-jmylchreest

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Code review and security auditing to improve quality, security, and maintainability of software changes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Comprehensive review: Evaluate code quality, security checks, and maintainability.
  • Threat assessment: Identify OWASP-related risks and best-practice gaps.
  • Team collaboration: Document findings, assign remediation, and track progress.

Quick Start

Run a code review pass on the latest diffs to start the audit.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate security audits and code reviews on pull requests?▼

Automated code reviews and security audits apply structured checklists to pull requests and diffs to identify quality, maintainability, and OWASP-related risks. This evaluates software changes systematically to ensure best practices across codebases.

What is the best way to identify OWASP risks in software diffs?▼

Identifying OWASP risks in software diffs requires a threat assessment process that evaluates code changes against security best practices. This structured approach documents findings and provides remediation guidance to close security gaps.

Does this code review checklist support static analysis tools?▼

This code review checklist supports integration with static analysis tools to evaluate maintainability and security. It combines automated scanning with structured reviews to assess code quality across diffs and pull requests.

How do I document code review findings and assign remediation tasks?▼

Documenting code review findings involves capturing quality, security, and maintainability issues in a structured format, then assigning remediation tasks to track progress. This ensures team collaboration on resolving identified best-practice gaps.

Can I run automated code reviews in CI workflows for maintainability checks?▼

Automated code reviews can run in CI workflows to evaluate maintainability and security on software changes. This applies a defined checklist to diffs and pull requests, outputting documented findings and remediation guidance.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
dbrijeshdbrijesh

review-gates

Manage structured human review checkpoints for code, security, architecture, and database changes.

Community
Advanced
marvinbissmarvinbiss

supabase-report-compare

Compare two Markdown security audit reports to track remediation progress and identify new vulnerabilities.

Community
Intermediate
ckrono-progckrono-prog

security_scan

Conducts a multi-scanner security audit of a codebase for critical and high vulnerabilities.

Community
Intermediate
ArdurAIArdurAI
1

god-dev-codebase

Automate codebase review, security audits, and performance analysis.

Official
Advanced