review-loop

You can automate a structured quality check for markdown, docx, pdf, pptx, and xlsx files by running a deterministic six-step workflow that identifies, verifies, reviews, fixes, re-scores, and reports on session deliverables.

A structured review loop is an automated process that applies a quality-score to modified deliverables, routes findings to a critic or devils-advocate, applies fixes, and generates a final summary report of remaining issues.

Yes, context routing adapts the automated review standards and uses subagents to differentiate between branded client work and internal projects during the quality verification process.

The review workflow verifies content consistency by applying a quality-score to each deliverable using the Bash tool, re-running the score after fixes are applied to ensure measurable improvement.

The best way to fix and re-score deliverables is to route findings to a critic, apply necessary fixes, and automatically re-score the updated files to confirm quality improvements before reporting.

The automated review workflow applies a quality-score to each deliverable using the Bash tool when available, ensuring deterministic verification and re-scoring of fixes across the session.