review-loop

Orchestrate automated software review cycles with structured feedback and resolution tracking.

1|Updated Jun 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/9thLevelSoftware/legion-ascended --skill review-loop-9thlevelsoftware
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-loop
Source: https://github.com/9thLevelSoftware/legion-ascended/tree/main/skills/review-loop
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/9thLevelSoftware/legion-ascended --skill review-loop-9thlevelsoftware

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires adapter, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the review process for software development, reducing the time spent on manual reviews and improving the quality of feedback.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Review Cycles: Manages iterative reviews, including testing, collecting findings, and coordinating fixes.
  • Structured Feedback: Ensures feedback follows a specific format for clarity and consistency.
  • Customizable Reviewers: Allows selection of reviewers based on the type of phase being reviewed.
  • Use Case: Automate the review of code changes by defining the appropriate reviewers, setting up the review cycle, and ensuring that feedback is structured and actionable.

Quick Start

Use the review-loop skill to initiate a review for the code changes made in the 'update-feature' branch.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-loop

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review cycles for software development?

Structured feedback ensures automated review findings follow a specific format for clarity and consistency. This allows selection of appropriate reviewers based on the phase being reviewed and coordinates actionable fixes.

Can I use QA automation to collect structured feedback during a test cycle?

QA automation can collect structured feedback during test cycles by ensuring findings follow a specific format for clarity. This process manages iterative reviews and coordinates necessary fixes within the development workflow.

Do I need an adapter to coordinate automated review agents?

An adapter is required to coordinate automated review agents, ensuring protocol compliance for agent spawning and coordination. This setup manages iterative testing and structured feedback collection within human-in-loop workflows.

What is the best way to track resolution for code changes in a human-in-loop workflow?

Tracking resolution for code changes in a human-in-loop workflow is best achieved by orchestrating structured review cycles. This manages testing, collects structured findings, and coordinates fixes to ensure actionable feedback.

Why does my automated review process lack actionable feedback?

An automated review process lacks actionable feedback when it fails to enforce a structured format for clarity and consistency. Implementing structured feedback collection ensures findings are coordinated and resolved properly across review cycles.