review-loop-design-impl

Compares design mock and implementation screenshots to detect and fix UI/UX discrepancies.

Updated Jun 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/carllelandtaylor/facto --skill review-loop-design-impl
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-loop-design-impl
Source: https://github.com/carllelandtaylor/facto/tree/main/plugins/facto/skills/review-loop-design-impl
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/carllelandtaylor/facto --skill review-loop-design-impl

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill ensures that the UI/UX of an implementation matches its design mock, providing automated comparison and a fix loop to correct discrepancies.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Mock Comparison: Compares screenshots of the design mock and the running app against a structured rubric.
  • Fix Loop: Automatically fixes discrepancies until the implementation matches the design mock.
  • Fallback Mechanism: Provides a manual checklist if no mock is available.
  • Use Case: When a design mock exists for a UI/UX implementation, use this Skill to automatically ensure the implementation matches the design, reducing manual checks and potential discrepancies.

Quick Start

Invoke the skill with /facto:review-loop-design-impl.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-loop-design-impl

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate UI/UX consistency checks against design mocks?

This Skill automates UI/UX consistency checks by capturing screenshots of both the design mock and the running implementation, comparing them against a structured rubric to identify discrepancies.

What is an automated fix loop for design implementation?

An automated fix loop continuously compares the running application screenshots against the design mock, applying corrections iteratively until the implementation matches the mock without requiring manual intervention.

How do I verify my software development implementation matches design mocks?

You verify implementation consistency by running an automated comparison against design mock screenshots, which checks visual discrepancies using a structured rubric and applies corrections through a fix loop.

Do I need design mock screenshots to run automated UI consistency checks?

While design mock screenshots are required for automated comparison and fix loops, the Skill provides a manual fallback checklist to verify UI/UX consistency when no mock is available.

Can I use image comparison for UI automation in software development?

Yes, image comparison and UI automation capabilities are required to run this Skill, allowing it to automatically detect and fix visual discrepancies between design mocks and the running implementation.

What happens when the UI implementation does not match the design mock?

When the implementation does not match the design mock, the fix loop automatically identifies the visual discrepancies and applies corrections iteratively until the implementation matches the mock.