review-loop-reviewer

Analyze PR diffs and emit structured YAML findings with a quality gate verdict.

1|Updated Mar 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kiloloop/oacp-skills --skill review-loop-reviewer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-loop-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/kiloloop/oacp-skills/tree/main/skills/review-loop-reviewer/claude
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kiloloop/oacp-skills --skill review-loop-reviewer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires gh, python3, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of reviewing code changes in a Pull Request (PR), identifying issues, and providing actionable feedback to the author, streamlining the code review workflow.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Code Analysis: Analyzes PR diffs for bugs, security vulnerabilities, and style issues.
  • Structured Findings: Generates a detailed findings report in a standardized YAML format.
  • Quality Gate: Evaluates changes against predefined criteria to determine if the PR meets quality standards.
  • Use Case: An agent acting as a code reviewer can use this Skill to automatically assess a submitted PR, flag any critical bugs, and provide specific recommendations for improvement before merging.

Quick Start

Use the review-loop-reviewer skill to review pull request number 123 for the author claude.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-loop-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for a pull request on GitHub?

Automated code review analyzes PR diffs to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities, and style issues, producing structured findings. This Skill automates that process by evaluating changes and emitting a quality gate verdict to determine if the PR meets quality standards.

What is a quality gate in a code review workflow?

A quality gate evaluates code changes against predefined criteria to determine if a PR meets quality standards before merging. It produces a verdict based on structured findings generated from analyzing PR diffs for bugs and vulnerabilities.

Do I need GitHub CLI installed to review pull requests?

Yes, GitHub CLI is required to execute the reviewer side of the code review loop. The Skill uses GitHub CLI for communication and context gathering to analyze PR diffs and provide structured feedback.

Can I get iterative feedback on a pull request instead of a single-pass review?

Iterative feedback is supported through in-session polling for continuous review. The Skill handles both single-pass review and iterative polling, using a hybrid architecture that separates I/O and analysis tasks for structured findings.

How does automated PR analysis format its code review findings?

Findings are generated as a detailed report in a standardized YAML format. This structured output accompanies the quality gate verdict, providing specific recommendations for improvement based on bugs, security vulnerabilities, and style issues found in the PR diff.

What are the limitations of using Python3 and GitHub CLI for automated code review?

The automated code review requires both Python3 and GitHub CLI dependencies to function. It relies on OACP messaging for communication and context gathering, meaning the environment must support these specific tools to execute the reviewer loop and emit quality gate verdicts.