review

To check staged git diffs against domain constraints, run the review process to analyze code differences and identify violations, risks, and checklist deviations based on injected domain context. It enforces predefined project standards and security policies before merging.

Automated code review for domain constraints is the process of analyzing staged code changes against injected domain context to identify violations, security risks, and checklist deviations. It ensures code changes adhere to predefined domain rules and best practices before production impact.

Yes, you need a pre-existing domain context established before reviewing code for compliance. The review process requires this injected domain context to function, using it as the baseline to evaluate staged code differences and enforce specific project standards.

You can enforce security and compliance policies on a feature branch by analyzing staged code differences against established domain constraints. This identifies potential risks and violations, verifying that new endpoints and changes comply with defined security and performance guidelines.

You should run an automated code review for quality assurance before merging a feature branch. It surfaces violations and missed checklist items by checking staged code diffs against your project's domain context, preventing critical violations from impacting production.

No, this code review process does not work without a pre-existing domain context. It explicitly requires a domain context established by the skill-graph to function, using that injected context to evaluate staged code differences and identify constraint violations.