review

To audit medical slides for assertion-evidence and accessibility compliance, apply this Skill to any lesson by reading aula/CLAUDE.md for context and slides/manifest for the slide list. It then produces per-slide PASS, WARN, and FAIL findings with actionable remediation notes.

Checking medical presentation slides for data accuracy and design-system conformance is done through a multi-agent review flow. It evaluates each slide against tailored audit criteria and generates structured PASS, WARN, or FAIL statuses with actionable remediation notes.

Generating per-slide PASS, WARN, and FAIL reports requires reading the target aula/CLAUDE.md and slides/manifest files. The multi-agent review flow then drills down into each slide and outputs actionable remediation insights for claims, evidence, and accessibility.

Yes, you can adapt audit criteria for different medical lessons using CLAUDE.md. The Skill reads the target aula/CLAUDE.md file to tailor its assertion-evidence, accessibility, and data accuracy checks to the specific context of that lesson.

Yes, the automated slide audit works without external dependencies or components. It operates self-contained by reading your lesson's CLAUDE.md and slide manifest, then applying a multi-agent review flow to generate per-slide findings and remediation notes.

A key limitation when auditing slides for quality assurance is that the Skill requires both aula/CLAUDE.md and slides/manifest files to function properly. Without these specific input files, it cannot establish the lesson context or slide list needed to produce per-slide findings.