Automate architecture reviews of feature plans and generate structured reports.
npx skills add https://github.com/matochu/pythia --skill review-matochu
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: review Source: https://github.com/matochu/pythia/tree/main/.agents/skills/review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/matochu/pythia --skill review-matochu
Review planning documents for gaps, risks, ambiguities, and wrong assumptions, then provide a structured verdict.
Provide a feature plan or chat context and let the skill generate a formal architectural review report.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Reviewing feature plans for gaps involves evaluating planning documents and related contexts to identify risks, ambiguities, and incorrect assumptions. This skill generates a formal architectural review report that helps ensure coherence with the codebase and architectural boundaries.
To identify risks and gaps in a feature plan, you can run an automated architecture review that evaluates the plan and related contexts across modules and integration points. This produces a structured review report with clear evidence for traceability.
Yes, the skill performs context-aware analysis across modules and integration points, considering related feature plans and architectural boundaries to ensure coherence. It evaluates the plan against the broader codebase context to identify gaps and risks.
Structuring an architecture review report for traceability requires formal review blocks compatible with the project's review format, including navigation updates for multi-round reviews. The skill generates this structured output with clear evidence for each identified gap or risk.
Yes, the skill operates without external dependencies, requiring only a feature plan or chat context as input. It independently applies context-aware analysis to generate a formal architectural review report.
Use an automated architecture review when you need to systematically evaluate feature plans for gaps, risks, ambiguities, and wrong assumptions across modules and integration points. It ensures context-aware analysis and structured reporting that manual reviews may overlook.
MaryHu-YRIdentify regulatory risk exposure across licenses, compliance, and penalties.
channingwaltonAnalyze code modules to discover edge cases and coverage gaps.
mikemylRevises feature specifications and plans from implementation-stage feedback.
serbanghitaCritique markdown execution plans for feasibility, architecture, and standards.
