review

Coordinate three independent agents to validate outputs and issue blocking verdicts.

Updated Apr 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mgsystemsdev/POD --skill review-mgsystemsdev
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review
Source: https://github.com/mgsystemsdev/POD/tree/main/agent-system-base/.claude/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mgsystemsdev/POD --skill review-mgsystemsdev

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Gate every output through three independent hardening agents before anything ships to ensure safety, security, and compliance.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Concurrent triage: run three agents (devil-advocate, security-reviewer, drift-detector) in parallel to audit proposals, decisions, or code changes.
  • Aggregation & action: consolidate verdicts into a single SHIP / REVISE / BLOCK decision and generate fix tasks if BLOCK.
  • Use cases: applicable to software changes, design proposals, or policy updates requiring risk controls.

Quick Start

Run the tri-agent hardening review on a proposed change and observe the aggregated outcome before publishing.

Frequently Asked Questions about review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a security audit on proposed code changes before shipping?

A multi-agent security audit works by running three independent hardening agents—a devil-advocate, security-reviewer, and drift-detector—in parallel to validate proposed code changes, design proposals, or policy updates. They aggregate their findings into a single SHIP, REVISE, or BLOCK verdict to enforce compliance and safety.

What is a three-agent hardening review process for software delivery?

A three-agent hardening review is a gating mechanism for software delivery where a devil-advocate, security-reviewer, and drift-detector concurrently audit an output. They consolidate their independent verdicts to determine if a proposed change, solution, or decision is safe to ship or requires revision.

Can I use this hardening review process for design proposals and policy updates?

Yes, you can use this hardening review process for design proposals and policy updates. The concurrent triage of the devil-advocate, security-reviewer, and drift-detector agents applies to any software delivery workflow or decision where risk controls, compliance, and safety matter.

How do the three independent agents aggregate their audit findings?

The three independent agents aggregate their audit findings through a dedicated consolidation step that reviews the parallel verdicts from the devil-advocate, security-reviewer, and drift-detector. This aggregation produces a single SHIP, REVISE, or BLOCK decision, generating fix tasks automatically if a blocking verdict is necessary.

What happens when a blocking verdict is triggered during a security review?

When a blocking verdict is triggered during a security review, the aggregation step generates specific fix tasks to address the risks identified by the hardening agents. This prevents the proposed code change, solution, or decision from shipping until the compliance and safety issues are resolved.